Home > miscellaneous > Amity and Enmity I

Amity and Enmity I


If you’re looking to tax your mind to the fullest and explore a novel and rigorous approach to sociological science, check out Dr. Rudolf Starkermann’s new web site, “Amity and Enmity”. The site was recently placed online by e-colleague Byron Davies and the wonderful story behind the site’s creation deserves its own separate, forthcoming blog post (Amity and Enmity II).

By syntegrating social concepts (e.g. willpower, consciousness, attitude, the unconscious, goal-seeking) with the concepts and mathematics from the engineering discipline of automatic control theory (e.g. amplification, error signal, feedback, transfer functions, stability, homeostasis, PID control), Dr. Starkermann models a living social “unit” as a self-realization seeking loop that is influenced by other social units via conscious observations/actions and subconscious “attitudes“. A social unit can represent a person, group, institution, or even a nation.

The first figure below shows a simplified first order model of the Starkermann social dualism. The second figure exposes the model’s intricately dense complexity. If you painstakingly trace out and count the number of loops in the socially coupled system, you’ll find that there are 12 of them. D’oh!

Did you have trouble finding the loops in the dualism? Well, don’t fret because here they are:

Double D’oh!

Even if you’re not an engineer who’s taken a course in automatic controls theory, you may get something out of “Amity And Enmity“. Dr. Starkermann valiantly tries to make his work accessible to the non-mathematical layman via many careful and empathic explanations throughout the treatise.

By fixing some parameters and varying others, Rudy has “calculated the behavior” of the dualism in a multitude of scenarios in order to discover what his models reveal about amity and enmity. Here’s a sample list of his “stark” conclusions:

  • Nature favors enmity and sets amity second.
  • Hostility is fast, consent is slow.
  • The faster a “unit” thinks, acts, the larger its willpower can be before it runs into instability and the better and faster it reaches its goal.
  • The probability is almost non-existent that a hate-relation changes into a friendship.
  • Hostility is solid. Friendship is fragile.

While sloowly making my way through the dense thicket that is “Amity And Enmity“, the following quote keeps coming to mind:

All models are wrong, but some are useful – George Box

  1. Kim Sommer
    January 28, 2012 at 5:06 pm

    Hi!

    I was very and happliy surprised to find this blog post. In 2008 as part of a systems engineering class I was asked to synopsize AE1. IN the course I had some contact with Dr. Starkermann via email.

    I’d like to get in touch with Byron Davies and hear the story of how the site was set up and also find out Dr. Starkermann is doing.

    Many thanks,
    Kim Sommer

    • January 28, 2012 at 7:35 pm

      Hi Kim,

      Thanks for dropping by! I’ve been in contact with Rudy, Byron, and Bill Livingston fairly regularly. Coincidently, I received Rudy’s “The structural complexity of mammal’s brain” booklet today – all the way from Switzerland via the kind Dr. himself! E-mail me at adasilva @ twcny dot rr dot com and I’ll give you their e-mail addresses.

      Cheers

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 439 other followers

%d bloggers like this: